Who will win the World Cup?

So, who do you think has the best chance? After seeing Germany beat England today I think they will be tough to beat. But, you might think differently.

I hope Holland...but objectively, Brazil has the most chances

My views are in no way biased.

I voted germany of course but thats just me hopeing... we have to many flaws in the defence... but all of the remaining teams are good and have chances...

Argentina since they're really good at cheating.

Brazil, FIFA and Blatter.

Brazil on the pitch.

FIFA will get stupid money for what has been a let down cup so far.

Blatter for ruining games because he refuses to allow video tech.

SciFiBoy wrote:Blatter for ruining games because he refuses to allow video tech.

Agreed. Allowing the 4th referee to review calls real quick and then tell the main referee would not take long at all. After the 1st replay we see it is very clear if a call was right or not. A 4th ref could just sit behind monitors and be ready to make calls when they are needed. I mean, every other sport uses this already.... Instant replay really is needed.

I don't mind video tech as long as matches aren't stopped in every play. I don't want a stop every 20 seconds to consult if it was this or that, it should be done in the case of a goal crossing the line or not (actually, a chip would be much easier and quicker), but NOT to check if it was a penalty...

zexen wrote:I don't mind video tech as long as matches aren't stopped in every play. I don't want a stop every 20 seconds to consult if it was this or that, it should be done in the case of a goal crossing the line or not (actually, a chip would be much easier and quicker), but NOT to check if it was a penalty...

why not for Penalties? hoping for a Van Persie dive are we?

SciFiBoy wrote:

zexen wrote:I don't mind video tech as long as matches aren't stopped in every play. I don't want a stop every 20 seconds to consult if it was this or that, it should be done in the case of a goal crossing the line or not (actually, a chip would be much easier and quicker), but NOT to check if it was a penalty...

why not for Penalties? hoping for a Van Persie dive are we?

Because it'd mean the game stopping every 5 seconds...rugby only videorefs to see if there was a try, not to see if X guy entered from the side or to see if it was a knock-on

zexen wrote:

SciFiBoy wrote:

zexen wrote:I don't mind video tech as long as matches aren't stopped in every play. I don't want a stop every 20 seconds to consult if it was this or that, it should be done in the case of a goal crossing the line or not (actually, a chip would be much easier and quicker), but NOT to check if it was a penalty...

why not for Penalties? hoping for a Van Persie dive are we?

Because it'd mean the game stopping every 5 seconds...rugby only videorefs to see if there was a try, not to see if X guy entered from the side or to see if it was a knock-on

okay, thats fair enough I guess.

I'm glad no one has voted for Spain yet ^___^

skeezer wrote:I'm glad no one has voted for Spain yet ^___^

no-one likes Spain, the media morons love them, so everyone else wants them to fail.

I voted for Spain:P

Germany because i have more attachment to that nation than the others.

I voted Brazil!

Spam!

SciFiBoy wrote:

skeezer wrote:I'm glad no one has voted for Spain yet ^___^

no-one likes Spain, the media morons love them, so everyone else wants them to fail.

I love Spain.

Spain > Germany > Holland.

there you have bastards! spain shut your mouths up!

Mmm, t'was a good WC!