NS Mafia Round 4

dsister wrote:

c03n3nj0 wrote:
1.THE VGC game was HUGE. Lurkers don't hurt as much. That's when they're bored townies. 2.And besides, my theory about that was proven wrong... twice.

In NS, the games are way smaller, and 1 lurker is more important than in 20 players.

3.Bwahahaha?

Okay then. 4.What other ideas have you posted?5. And what was your point by "why not a vote?"

1. That's two sided though. They don't hurt as much but it doesn't hurt the town as much to mislynch one or two of them. If we were to do that here then it could potentially cut the game in half.
2. Yeah!but you didn't know that at the time of your post in this thread did you? And if you say one thing as town then go and say the opposite thing within a short time then it looks awfully scummy...(which I hadn't even noticed till you brought this up)
3. Sorry that just cracked me up xD
4. I don't have one yet... Last time I made a great plan on NS that would have ended with a victory from the town you guys went "lol dsis you scum!" and lynched me
5.Vote apply more pressure then HoS which aren't anything... I've said this several times over the last games i've played....
Edited: Fixed the quote box

Dgc1808 wrote:Say Dsister was lynched... depending on wether he's scum or not, how would you guys feel about lynching SciFiboy (assuming his posting habits stay this way throughout today and tomorrow)?

and about Day1: I wanted to vote because it's a very small game. I usually want something done in a big game on day1 aswel but in a small game like this it feels even more crucial. There's just so limited time that we have to get things done and each kill the mafia gets is a very big hit no matter how you look at it when there's a small player count.

Dgc1808 wrote:Say Dsister was lynched... depending on wether he's scum or not, how would you guys feel about lynching SciFiboy (assuming his posting habits stay this way throughout today and tomorrow)?

and about Day1: I wanted to vote because it's a very small game. I usually want something done in a big game on day1 aswel but in a small game like this it feels even more crucial. There's just so limited time that we have to get things done and each kill the mafia gets is a very big hit no matter how you look at it when there's a small player count.

c03n3nj0 wrote:
1. You don't lynch lurkers, you modkill them. Read my posts, son!
2. aha... no. Your original post implies that, a FoS is not enough, but you would vote DGC. If anything, that's saying he deserves a vote. That's backing something up.

If you didn't mean that, or are now changing your meanings, so be it.
3. Your face cracks me up!
4. Right... or maybe, laying low.
5. See #2.

c03n3nj0 wrote:OH HOLD ONE DSISTER

ohohoho

Look at this from day one:

"I'm up for a lynch! Preferably not me."~ dsister

All right, this is you agreeing with me on the random lynch. Now, if you are against lynching lurkers, then why would you go for a random lynch, if, possibly, it could end up worse?

Me thinks that you're too busy defending your points, than actually being consistent.

Let's vote for him, guys!

c03n3nj0 wrote:OH HOLD ONE DSISTER

ohohoho

Look at this from day one:

"I'm up for a lynch! Preferably not me."~ dsister

All right, this is you agreeing with me on the random lynch. Now, if you are against lynching lurkers, then why would you go for a random lynch, if, possibly, it could end up worse?

Me thinks that you're too busy defending your points, than actually being consistent.

Let's vote for him, guys!

dsister wrote:And for goodness sake I am voting someone for being british... that's hardly what I call trying to lay low >.>

dsister wrote:

c03n3nj0 wrote:OH HOLD ONE DSISTER

ohohoho

Look at this from day one:

"I'm up for a lynch! Preferably not me."~ dsister

All right, this is you agreeing with me on the random lynch. Now, if you are against lynching lurkers, then why would you go for a random lynch, if, possibly, it could end up worse?

Me thinks that you're too busy defending your points, than actually being consistent.

Let's vote for him, guys!

Again you are putting words in my mouth... Who said I was up for a random lynch? I would have liked to have a bit of discussion on the first day then gone from there and perhaps made an educated lynch. But I wasn't aware of the closing time limit and so my vote stayed on Scifiboy. Which was my RV.

c03n3nj0 wrote:

dsister wrote:And for goodness sake I am voting someone for being british... that's hardly what I call trying to lay low >.>

No one's arguing that!

dsister wrote:-___- RV is random vote. Since it occurred during the random vote stage

c03n3nj0 wrote:

dsister wrote:-___- RV is random vote. Since it occurred during the random vote stage

Quit it with the random letters >_>

c03n3nj0 wrote:[

At the bolded:

"Vote: Scifiboy

Look at his avatar! He is obviously a storm trooper in disguise!"

Your vote for ScifiBoy was a joke vote. So no, you never made clear that you wanted to keep contribution and where going for ScifiBoy. The reasoning you give for that post can't be backed up according to all your posts on day one. You could just be lying to make them seem cleaner.

j0j0 wrote:
I am not putting words into people's mouths when I directly quote them. You posted that RIGHT after my proposition, you can't take it as any other way besides agreeing with me.

c0j0nes wrote:
IN FACT:

All of your posts on day 1 were either joke posts are on the Falcon thing. The Falcon thing and you post agreeing with a lynch contradict each other in my eyes.

c03n3nj0 wrote:

dsister wrote:And for goodness sake I am voting someone for being british... that's hardly what I call trying to lay low >.>

No one's arguing that!

c03n3nj0 wrote:
or B) he's just trying to lay low, and go with the flow.

c03n3nj0 wrote:

4. Right... or maybe, laying low.

dsister wrote:

c03n3nj0 wrote:[

At the bolded:

"Vote: Scifiboy

Look at his avatar! He is obviously a storm trooper in disguise!"

Your vote for ScifiBoy was a joke vote. So no, you never made clear that you wanted to keep contribution and where going for ScifiBoy. The reasoning you give for that post can't be backed up according to all your posts on day one. You could just be lying to make them seem cleaner.

I'm not sure what you are saying here... >.>

j0j0 wrote:
I am not putting words into people's mouths when I directly quote them. You posted that RIGHT after my proposition, you can't take it as any other way besides agreeing with me.

You aren't directly quoting a lot of this stuff though. But I guess you really aren't putting words into my mouth. Just jumping to conclusions then stating them as facts.

c0j0nes wrote:
IN FACT:

All of your posts on day 1 were either joke posts are on the Falcon thing. The Falcon thing and you post agreeing with a lynch contradict each other in my eyes.

You also are missing my twenty posts saying I was going to spam the thread "tomorrow"

dsister wrote:And you still haven't made a statement on #2!

c03n3nj0 wrote:

dsister wrote:And you still haven't made a statement on #2!

Yes I did.

dsister wrote:

c03n3nj0 wrote:

dsister wrote:And for goodness sake I am voting someone for being british... that's hardly what I call trying to lay low >.>

No one's arguing that!

Then why have you brought it up twice?!? >.<

c03n3nj0 wrote:
or B) he's just trying to lay low, and go with the flow.

c03n3nj0 wrote:

4. Right... or maybe, laying low.

c03n3nj0 wrote:
1. That was the RV thing. Your fault for not being clear in the first place. >.>

2. Not directly quoting what? I quoted the whole post. I jump to conclusions, because you cannot call you saying "sure, let's lynch" after my proposition, anything besides agreeing with it. You know it too.

You never mentioned willing to discuss the matter. Just that little short post.

3. You made that "i'll spam tomorrow" post on a wednesday. The day ended on a Sunday. "tomorrow" was long over.

Just agree to be lynched.