NS Mafia Round 4

A Bad Clown wrote:

c03n3nj0 wrote:

dsister wrote:And you still haven't made a statement on #2!

Yes I did.

what's up with all these statements? I can't understand what's going on....it's Avatar all over again!!!

Just suck it up and read the thread for the 3D effects.

Or vote dsister.

dsister wrote:

c03n3nj0 wrote:
1. That was the RV thing. Your fault for not being clear in the first place. >.>

2. Not directly quoting what? I quoted the whole post. I jump to conclusions, because you cannot call you saying "sure, let's lynch" after my proposition, anything besides agreeing with it. You know it too.

You never mentioned willing to discuss the matter. Just that little short post.

3. You made that "i'll spam tomorrow" post on a wednesday. The day ended on a Sunday. "tomorrow" was long over.

Just agree to be lynched.

2. Your proposition!?!? It was a question(or I saw it as such). -__- "who wants to try to lynch someone?" I said I would. I kind of figured more people would have jumped on your question and then we could have continued. I made my post, talked in chat, then went to bed. Without checking the thread. By the time I got on Sunday the day was over

3. Didn't you get on my case for not getting what the "" meant?

2. Proposition - I was proposing something. It was in a form of a question, but I was proposing it, no?

3. I just wanted to prove you wrong.

Also, more jokes now makes you look suspicious.

c03n3nj0 wrote:

A Bad Clown wrote:

c03n3nj0 wrote:

dsister wrote:And you still haven't made a statement on #2!

Yes I did.

what's up with all these statements? I can't understand what's going on....it's Avatar all over again!!!

Just suck it up and read the thread for the 3D effects.

Or vote dsister.

c03n3nj0 wrote:[
Erm, that's actually not what I meant. I take the blame for being clear.

I meant the "No one's arguing that" in the literal manner. No one was talking about it. >_>

But, c'mon. How can a joke vote honestly help your defense? Joke votes are the definition of laying low.

Everybody knows it's a joke and ignores them.

Because I joke voted Scifiboy! You know how he is, He enjoys the game he gets wrapped up in it and he usually has a lot to say about joke votes. I even made mention of his weird behavior when he took it lightly.

dsister wrote:

c03n3nj0 wrote:[
Erm, that's actually not what I meant. I take the blame for being clear.

I meant the "No one's arguing that" in the literal manner. No one was talking about it. >_>

But, c'mon. How can a joke vote honestly help your defense? Joke votes are the definition of laying low.

Everybody knows it's a joke and ignores them.

Because I joke voted Scifiboy! You know how he is, He enjoys the game he gets wrapped up in it and he usually has a lot to say about joke votes. I even made mention of his weird behavior when he took it lightly.

Maybe... because...

he knew it was just a joke. -_-

c03n3nj0 wrote:

dsister wrote:

c03n3nj0 wrote:
2.And besides, my theory about that was proven wrong... twice.

2. Yeah!but you didn't know that at the time of your post in this thread did you? And if you say one thing as town then go and say the opposite thing within a short time then it looks awfully scummy...(which I hadn't even noticed till you brought this up)

2. aha... no. Your original post implies that, a FoS is not enough, but you would vote DGC. If anything, that's saying he deserves a vote. That's backing something up.

If you didn't mean that, or are now changing your meanings, so be it.

Your theory was that lurkers are most of the time townies. Your response to me was completely random...

Y'know what. Give me a bulleted list of why you suspect me -___-

We are going around in circles..

Okay, just to make it easier for my fellow good characters, this is why dsister is scum:

1.Contradiction between random lynch and lurker lynch:

He hasn't refuted this, mind you, and he is against lurker lynches, but somehow, is not against a random lynch even though it could prove to be worse.

This leads me to believe that that lurker fiasco was just to make him seem pro-town. A possible mislynch, though, was not against his mafia-ness.

2. That DGC thing. why hasn't he contributed anything else, besides telling me that an FoS on DGC is not enough, and simply turning my statement into a question?

I mean, it was a looong time before I said my suspicions against him. He could've scum-hunted in the meanwhile.

3. Jokes, he jokes too much.

4. 2&3 are just ways of laying low.

Conclusion, contradiction and laying low, although seemingly posting.

Come to think of it, A bad Clown also fits 3 very well. Gonna hang him off the noose too.

I already answered 1 and 2... I'll go back tomorrow and dig them up... still dodging #2 I see

dsister wrote:

c03n3nj0 wrote:

dsister wrote:

c03n3nj0 wrote:
2.And besides, my theory about that was proven wrong... twice.

2. Yeah!but you didn't know that at the time of your post in this thread did you? And if you say one thing as town then go and say the opposite thing within a short time then it looks awfully scummy...(which I hadn't even noticed till you brought this up)

2. aha... no. Your original post implies that, a FoS is not enough, but you would vote DGC. If anything, that's saying he deserves a vote. That's backing something up.

If you didn't mean that, or are now changing your meanings, so be it.

Your theory was that lurkers are most of the time townies. Your response to me was completely random...

I actually don't get how this makes sense. I probably misread it.

But I already answered the logic behind my lurker stance.

j0, you and dsister are starting to look suspicious. I'm starting to think dude was right when he mentioned the fake arguing. I don't like the look of this... I'm starting to think we actually did find our mafia.... what do you think DGC?

A Bad Clown wrote:j0, you and dsister are starting to look suspicious. I'm starting to think dude was right when he mentioned the fake arguing. I don't like the look of this... I'm starting to think we actually did find our mafia.... what do you think DGC?

This is extremely paranoid of you. -_-

Also, through out the whole thing you have commented nothing about it. Mind saying your suspects, or even if you suspect dsister?

c03n3nj0 wrote:

A Bad Clown wrote:j0, you and dsister are starting to look suspicious. I'm starting to think dude was right when he mentioned the fake arguing. I don't like the look of this... I'm starting to think we actually did find our mafia.... what do you think DGC?

This is extremely paranoid of you. -_-

Also, through out the whole thing you have commented nothing about it. Mind saying your suspects, or even if you suspect dsister?

Yeah I'm starting to suspect him...and you! I don't see DGC or SciFi trying to make such a big arguement out of this. It doesn't help that dude picked up on this before he got killed, I might have to trust dude's judgement....

edited comma

A Bad Clown wrote:

c03n3nj0 wrote:

A Bad Clown wrote:j0, you and dsister are starting to look suspicious. I'm starting to think dude was right when he mentioned the fake arguing. I don't like the look of this... I'm starting to think we actually did find our mafia.... what do you think DGC?

This is extremely paranoid of you. -_-

Also, through out the whole thing you have commented nothing about it. Mind saying your suspects, or even if you suspect dsister?

Yeah I'm starting to suspect him...and you! I don't see DGC or SciFi trying to make such a big arguement out of this. It doesn't help that dude picked up on this before he got killed, I might have to trust dude's judgement....

edited comma

DGC and Scifi are not online/contributing at all.

It's basically only you, dsister and I.

c03n3nj0 wrote:

A Bad Clown wrote:

c03n3nj0 wrote:

A Bad Clown wrote:j0, you and dsister are starting to look suspicious. I'm starting to think dude was right when he mentioned the fake arguing. I don't like the look of this... I'm starting to think we actually did find our mafia.... what do you think DGC?

This is extremely paranoid of you. -_-

Also, through out the whole thing you have commented nothing about it. Mind saying your suspects, or even if you suspect dsister?

Yeah I'm starting to suspect him...and you! I don't see DGC or SciFi trying to make such a big arguement out of this. It doesn't help that dude picked up on this before he got killed, I might have to trust dude's judgement....

edited comma

DGC and Scifi are not online/contributing at all.

It's basically only you, dsister and I.

Er....that's great! The only other two active people in the game are probably mafia and are going to kill me. Déjà vu?

edited out of qoute box

Where's dsister's defense? >_>

c03n3nj0 wrote:Where's dsister's defense? >_>

In the toilet....because YOU'RE obviously planning this!

A Bad Clown wrote:

c03n3nj0 wrote:Where's dsister's defense? >_>

In the toilet....because YOU'RE obviously planning this!

That's absolutely ludicrous.

I want dsister lynched.

c03n3nj0 wrote:

A Bad Clown wrote:

c03n3nj0 wrote:Where's dsister's defense? >_>

In the toilet....because YOU'RE obviously planning this!

That's absolutely ludicrous.

I want dsister lynched.

Why do you want him lynched so bad then >.>

A Bad Clown wrote:

c03n3nj0 wrote:

A Bad Clown wrote:

c03n3nj0 wrote:Where's dsister's defense? >_>

In the toilet....because YOU'RE obviously planning this!

That's absolutely ludicrous.

I want dsister lynched.

Why do you want him lynched so bad then >.>

Have you not been reading the thread?

He's the only damn suspect we have right now.

c03n3nj0 wrote:

A Bad Clown wrote:

c03n3nj0 wrote:

A Bad Clown wrote:

c03n3nj0 wrote:Where's dsister's defense? >_>

In the toilet....because YOU'RE obviously planning this!

That's absolutely ludicrous.

I want dsister lynched.

Why do you want him lynched so bad then >.>

Have you not been reading the thread?

He's the only damn suspect we have right now.

But why such ganging up, we haven't questioned anyone else. It's starting to look like you just plain want dsis out for last time!

A Bad Clown wrote:

c03n3nj0 wrote:

A Bad Clown wrote:

c03n3nj0 wrote:

A Bad Clown wrote:

c03n3nj0 wrote:Where's dsister's defense? >_>

In the toilet....because YOU'RE obviously planning this!

That's absolutely ludicrous.

I want dsister lynched.

Why do you want him lynched so bad then >.>

Have you not been reading the thread?

He's the only damn suspect we have right now.

But why such ganging up, we haven't questioned anyone else. It's starting to look like you just plain want dsis out for last time!

No one else is posting.

c03n3nj0 wrote:

A Bad Clown wrote:

c03n3nj0 wrote:

A Bad Clown wrote:

c03n3nj0 wrote:

A Bad Clown wrote:

c03n3nj0 wrote:Where's dsister's defense? >_>

In the toilet....because YOU'RE obviously planning this!

That's absolutely ludicrous.

I want dsister lynched.

Why do you want him lynched so bad then >.>

Have you not been reading the thread?

He's the only damn suspect we have right now.

But why such ganging up, we haven't questioned anyone else. It's starting to look like you just plain want dsis out for last time!

No one else is posting.

Errr...well then lets start accusing someone someone else in hopes that they'll become active to see where we're actually going!

Been busy the last two days, and my brother is home from college today. So more posts tomorrow

Okay, anyone notice SciFi hasn't been as active as he was last round? I think he's lurking for a reason....a deadly reason!